If you’ve been considering a roof replacement, you may be wondering whether you should file a lawsuit against Atlas Shingles. Sadly, the shingles sold by Atlas Roofing aren’t up to par. They have been known to crack and blister, and water can get into the home if you use them. As a result, the only way to repair them is to replace them completely. But this isn’t always an option.
Chalet shingles are prone to blistering
When it comes to shingles, some types are prone to blistering. This is a cosmetic flaw in some types of roofing. But this flaw quickly becomes a wear hazard. In some cases, blistering is caused by improperly installed shingles, poorly-ventilated attics, and even debris on the roof. Regardless of the cause, if blistering occurs, it’s time to replace the roof.
Blistering typically occurs when granules have not adhered to the surface of the shingle during its installation. When this happens, granules form a raised dome and are waiting for pressure or impact to fracture them. This granule-laden dome can then wash off the roof surface with the next rainfall or snowmelt. In some cases, the entire shingle can experience blistering.
When it comes to Atlas Chalet shingles, you need to be aware of their shortcomings. These three-tab shingles are prone to cracking and blistering. Consequently, they can fail prematurely, leading to leaks and other damage. Even worse, they can also be prone to moisture penetration. That’s why you need an inspector to inspect your roof and help you file an insurance claim. If you’re wondering about Atlas Chalet shingles, contact the experts today.
They are prone to cracking
You’ve probably noticed that your Atlas shingles are showing signs of wear and tear. They may even begin to leak after five years! They also might pop or blister, especially during warm weather. And because they’re not layered, they are more likely to crack when the weather turns severe. So, if you’ve recently installed new shingles in your home, you should watch out for this problem. If you’ve already experienced these symptoms, you’re not alone.
The shingle that is prone to cracking is the second layer of granules. Although the main protective layers of your roof are still intact, you can expect your Atlas shingles to crack or blister over time. This is common, especially in older shingles. However, you may have noticed the first layer of granules is cracked. That means that there’s a problem with the construction of the shingle.
They are prone to water infiltration
The company is not responsible for damage to shingles caused by inadequate ventilation. Proper ventilation provisions must comply with current FHA Minimum Property Standards and all building codes. Specifically, ventilation provisions must combine eave and ridge vents to provide full flow through ventilation. Atlas recommends using a combination of these ventilation methods. In addition, all roof structures should include complete flow-through ventilation. This article will discuss how to ensure that the ventilation in your Atlas shingle installation is adequate.
The roofer installing the shingles should follow the manufacturer’s instructions carefully. The Atlas Pro-Cut(r) Hip & Ridge shingles must be sufficiently flexible and warm to withstand 130 mph wind speeds. The application of the shingles should be made with the shingles separated by five and a half inches and should be completed with two nails per shingle. The nails must be placed at least 6 inches back from the exposed end and one inch up from the edge.
They cannot be repaired
A class action lawsuit is filed against the company that manufactured Atlas Shingles. The lawsuit alleges that Atlas shingles do not last long and are susceptible to leaks. As a result, homeowners must pay for replacement or repair costs. There are several ways to get a free replacement roof after you’ve leaked the Atlas shingle. Read on to learn more. This product is no longer being manufactured.
The lawsuit alleges that Atlas was aware of the alleged defect but failed to disclose it to consumers, thereby infringing on the implied warranty. In addition, plaintiffs point to internal documents indicating that Atlas knew about the defect. A claim under the doctrine of fraud has five elements. Reliance is hotly contested, but the other two elements are clear: the product must be defective and a reasonable buyer could have known about the defect.
I had my roof replaced due to hailstorm damage about 10 years ago. I started losing shingles off the roof after three years. My roofer (Jeff) continued replacing shingles every time I called him for several years and one day, he said the shingles were defective because they had never sealed properly in spite of the hot summers we have in San Antonio. He promised to contact Atlas roofing about the problem, but he never did because the left San Antonio to go work in Louisiana. I called Jeff many times but had no call backs, but I finally got a call from his former Foreman, Eddie that informed me Jeff went out of business, but Eddie said he now had his own construction company and he offered help. He inspected the roof and confirmed the problem. Eddie suggested I contact Atlas Roofing Company the manufacturer, so I did and I received some forms to initiate a claim. I’m in the process of completing the form to mail it back to Atlas along with two roof shingles off my house they requested. I’ve read a number of articles I found online regarding other folks having similar problems and I wonder which way to go here. Any recommendations?