Monitronics Class Action Lawsuit

Class Action Settlement for Telemarketing Violations

According to the classaction lawsuit, the leading home security company violated the TCPA (TCPA) by utilizing an automated telephone dialer system or a prerecorded or artificial voice to make unauthorized telemarketing phone calls to cellular phones. The Monitronics defendant denies any wrongdoing but settled the TCPA class action lawsuit in order to avoid the expense and burden of continuing litigation. The agreement was filed in the Southern District of Florida. The court found that the telemarketers called more than thirteen hundred residential numbers with the automated dialer device and received information pertaining to bank account numbers, etc.

The class action lawsuit was subsequently granted final approval on August 8, 2021. The plaintiffs were permitted to file a lawsuit against the defendant under the provisions of the Telecommunication Practices Act, a statute that protects consumers from abusive and harassing telephone calls. The settlement would resolve the lawsuit, but the plaintiffs still retained their right to pursue additional claims against the defendant under the statutes that govern telephone lawsuits.

The complaint against the defendant offers detailed descriptions of the manner in which the defendants violated the TCPA. This is a very good class action lawsuit resource because it provides a detailed listing of the companies that are accused of committing violations of the TCPA. In addition, the Monitronics defendant is also accused of attempting to circumvent the Telephone Consumer Protection Act’s Section 512, which requires that companies providing automated dialer systems obtain consumer consent prior to sending commercial messages to cellular phone customers. (Section 512 also covers toll free non-emergency numbers.)

The complaint further reveals that the defendants attempted to use deceptive and improper practices to collect the non-thermal fees it charged customers for using their telephone dialing systems. Examples include: maintaining fake phone books that purported to show the names and addresses of local businesses; maintaining unwritten listings in various places throughout the United States in violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act; maintaining misleading records regarding the identities of the customers who placed the phone calls; and maintaining incorrect or false information with respect to the numbers listed in the phone directory. These and other examples demonstrate that the defendants deliberately sought to circumvent the legitimate purposes of the TCPA.

If you would like to join the Class Action lawsuit, you will need to complete and submit the Class Action Lawsuit Certification form by visiting the links below. One of the forms is the Certification Claim Form and the other is the Settlement Administrator Certification Form. Once you have completed both forms, you will be required to submit your Claim Forms and / or Settlement Administrator Certification forms. Once received, you will receive notification of your lawsuit number and instructions on how to begin making a claim for Monitronics services. If you wish to pursue a claim for negligence, then the Monitronics liability insurance policy can be used to pay any damages you are owed.

Some states do not allow the use of the TCPA in a personal injury claim. However, a class action lawsuit is one of the few instances in which the statute of limitations can be applied to prevent a party from being able to prolong its litigation. It is also important to note that a TCPA claim cannot be based on any theories of breach of warranty, fraud, or negligence, and is not a private law suit. Rather, it is a civil law claim. If you are seeking monitronics class action settlements, contact an attorney today.

One thought on “Monitronics Class Action Lawsuit

  1. An investigation and class action should be considered for their unethical sales practices and contracts that are three years with no escape clause even in case medical hardship. Many complaints of sales people going door to door posing as ADT security installers coming to upgrade equipment and then having owners sign a receipt which is really a contract from a equipment company signing up customers to Brinks at double the price. A breach of privacy because these installers had all personal information including bank routing and account numbers of prospective customers. How did they get these is a mystery. ADT says they know this is going on and have tried to stop it and and continuing to look into it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *