Amylin Pharmaceuticals Lawsuit Against Eli Lilly and Company


The Amylin Pharmaceuticals lawsuit was filed last month against Eli Lilly and Company. The San Diego-based company says its Phase III clinical trials were adequate and that it knew there was a problem with the methodology used in conjunction with these trials. The lawsuit also cites Lilly’s involvement in the Proposed Transaction. The plaintiff claims that Lilly was negligent in failing to disclose the existence of the Phase III trials. In the article, Amylin’s lawyer said that Lilly was not aware of the problem, despite the FDA’s approval.

Amylin’s Phase III clinical trials were sufficient

A recent lawsuit asserts that the FDA’s approval of Amylin Pharmaceuticals’ Symlin was premature and unfounded. In addition to the FDA’s approval of Symlin, the company spent millions on phase III clinical trials. In 1997, Amylin submitted the Symlin NDA to the FDA. However, the company didn’t disclose that it had disclosed the study design and methodology to the FDA, which made statements about the sufficiency of its trials untrue.

Despite the Court’s ruling, the FDA’s approval of Symlin was premature. The plaintiffs’ claims were not supported by any clinical trials. Moreover, the Amylin-Lilly collaboration deal was signed in 2002. It restricted Lilly from using the same sales force and from disclosing confidential information about the drug. Thus, the Court denied Amylin Pharmaceuticals’ motion to dismiss.

Amylin’s NDA for Symlin was submitted to the FDA

Earlier this month, Amylin Pharmaceuticals’ NDA for its diabetes drug Symlin was submitted to the FDA. Although it did not gain approval for several indications, the FDA approved Symlin in the U.S. based on its efficacy and safety profile. This drug is not approved for use with mealtime insulin or basal insulin.

On September 8, Amylin submitted its third and final NDA for Symlin to the FDA. The NDA includes the dose-titration study in type 1 diabetes and four smaller pharmacology studies. The company has scheduled a six-month review period for this new submission. Amylin believes that its Phase III trials are adequate to support the drug’s approval in the US market.

Lilly’s involvement in the Proposed Transaction

Eli Lilly has been the target of a new lawsuit filed by Amylin Pharmaceuticals, Inc. The San Diego-based company accuses the giant of engaging in anticompetitive behavior. The two companies collaborated on a type 2 diabetes treatment called exenatide, which is marketed under the brand name Byetta. Another product called Bydureon, an extended-release injectable suspension is currently under FDA review.

The recent court action stems from a collaboration agreement between Amylin and Eli Lilly. Amylin has alleged that Lilly violated the agreement by using the same sales force to market and sell its diabetes drug exenatide. In addition, Amylin claims that Lilly disclosed confidential information about exenatide to Boehringer Ingelheim. The lawsuit is ongoing, but the implications are far-reaching.

Lilly’s response to Amylin’s lawsuit

Eli Lilly is being sued by Amylin Pharmaceuticals for anti-competitive behavior. The company alleges that Lilly has violated a 2002 agreement to market exenatide (Byetta), a diabetes drug. The two companies signed an agreement for the development of similar medications. Amylin says linagliptin will compete with its exenatide products.

The two companies agree that the process of early neutral evaluation should be streamlined and reduced. Amylin also suggests that the two companies combine cases, which will reduce duplicative discovery and conflicting pretrial rulings. This approach would be convenient for all parties, witnesses, and courts. Lilly has expressed a willingness to consolidate the cases, which would improve efficiency. This agreement may help to end the ongoing litigation.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *